Keep Talking, They Can Hear Us!

20130301-155616.jpg
The NASS delegation at Chatham House, London. 27th February 2013

During the course of an interactive session with members of the Nigerian National Assembly (NASS) ad-hoc Constitution Review committee, at the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the NASS delegation alluded severally to the power of Facebook and Twitter in engagement on national issues. The Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, RT Hon. Emeka Ihedioha encouraged Nigerians to continue using Facebook and Twitter to deliberate on national issues rather than “abusing each other”, at least with reference to the Constitution review. And this got me thinking: so they can hear the voices on social media, they can hear the “children of anger“.

Apparently, the tweeting, Facebook posts and groups, blogs, online news and other social media tools through which many of us are able to articulate our views and general feelings towards national issues, policies, corruption, national disasters and so on is not in futility as some would like to think. Not only does this admission by the NASS delegation reinforce this, but recall, President Jonathan last year, said he was the “most criticised President” in the world, implicitly referring to the critical social media voices of Nigeria. Jonathan’s spokesperson Dr. Reuben Abati also acknowledged, albeit derisively, the increasingly loud and critical voices of young Nigerians referring to us as the “…idle and idling, twittering, collective children of anger“.

Yes, we are angry, as any sane person remotely interested in the progress of Nigeria should be, and we are pouring our hearts out in many ways via social and new media tools. Even better, our voices are no longer chattering meaningless noises to those whom it is aimed for, the voices are audible and real. Our leaders can hear us, make no mistake about that. Whether they use their own social media accounts, or deploy their army of Special Assistants to trawl through cyberspace, they can hear us, even though hearing does not necessarily equate to listening. The latter connotes a two-way communication and an implicit obligation on the part of the listener to respond or act on the information they are receiving.

The onus thus is on us, to move to the next phase, to ensure our voices are not only heard, but that our leaders listen, and that the voices translate into effective demands for transparency and accountability at the national level but importantly, at the sub-national level. We need to use our 45million strong internet population according to the World Internet Statistics (2011 figures) to focus less on unfounded, hateful, unsubstantiated, malicious and mindless chatter and focus more on productive engagement with one another. Sharing gory pictures of unverified crime scenes, unconfirmed rumours of religious or ethnic violence, distasteful jokes stereotyping other faiths or ethnic groups and being reflexively antagonistic and needlessly suspicious of anything-government-related with little logic or few facts, is unproductive.

Social and new media tools provide a unique opportunity — they have widened the democratic space, no voice or opinion can be marginalised anymore within this sphere of discourse. Let’s use this opportunity well, let’s keep engaging in productive talk because they can hear us!

Advertisements

Stereotypes, Prejudices and the Social Media

“The greatest fallacy about Africa perpetrated by Africans themselves quite as much

as by White Westerners or Yellow Easterners, is that Africa is one great homogenous

whole, almost one country with one pattern and one inevitable destiny”

– John Barton

On Monday 9th May, I had the privilege of attending a conference organized by Overseas Development Institute (ODI) and One World Media on lessons to be learnt from the role of the social media in the revolutions in the Arab world, notably Tunisia and Egypt. Amidst all of the seeming excitement and euphoria over the tremendous power of the social media (Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, Blogging etc) and all the lovely benefits it can spread to the world by encouraging accountability, freedom of expression and promotion of democracy in general, the panelists notably James Deane, Head of Policy, BBC World Service Trust; Mark Harvey, Executive Director, Internews Europe and also Jonathan Glennie of ODI sounded a note of caution. Their skepticism centered on the potentially negative consequences of this ‘power’ of social media in some situations particularly in developing countries, where it can be used as an avenue to easily and rapidly spread stereotypes, hate and lies and fan the flames of already fragile and tense situations, thereby undermining democracy. To me, that aptly captured the growing and worrying trend in Nigeria which actually started with the mainstream print and broadcast media, and now appears to be exacerbated and even made easier by social media.

Historically, the exaggerated and sometimes stereotyping of Africans has been the forte of the Western-international media which is cultivated and entrenched in the mind of the average Westerners due to biased, unfair, inaccurate or exaggerated reports. With so much already written and documented about this, I hardly need to repeat what this entails. However, the two most common of these involve first of all, that Africa is regarded more as a country and less as a continent. Never mind that the African continent comprises of 53 distinct countries from Arab countries like Libya, Morocco and Tunisia north of the Sahara those in the southern part like South Africa, Namibia and Zimbabwe all with varying levels of development and standards of living. The very diverse people not minding the distinct peculiarities of their origins, their socio-cultural, economic and political environments and even variations in race, skin colour, ethnicity and religion are all clumped together and referred to as if they all come from one country, the African country.

Secondly and more importantly, the image of Africa and Africans portrayed by the international media is one generally of remote villages ravaged by poverty, disease, squalor, war and all sorts of imaginable or rather, unimaginable misery. The people are usually shown to be wallowing in abject poverty; dying of HIV/AIDS, famine and hunger; are violence prone, superstitious, barbaric or exhibiting characteristics that are more or less sub-human; women and children are usually victims of all sorts of imaginable/unimaginable violence and oppression…the list goes on. Documentaries and feature stories made on African countries usually depict negative situations like coups, unrest, human trafficking and slavery or  (harmful) traditional practices that victimize Africans or even Westerners. These have been accused of being highly exaggerated or of only showcasing extreme cases that are not the norm and not representative of the situation on ground, while stories that would project a positive image are not considered newsworthy and subjected to blackouts. For example, parts of a documentary was recently aired on CNN’s Inside Africa on the Sakawa phenomenon in Ghana which stirred some controversy when many Ghanaians and Ghanaian bloggers  accused CNN and the documentary’s producers of exaggerating the situation. So also the BBC Welcome to Lagos trilogy which aired last year on people in Lagos slums struggling to eke out an honest livelihood was roundly condemned by people like Wole Soyinka the Nigerian Nobel laureate, Dalhatu Sarki Tafida the immediate former Nigerian High Commissioner to the UK and others of only portraying the negative aspects. You can watch it here

However, things are gradually looking-up as the international media  is ‘gradually’, albeit painfully slowly making effort in portraying more positive images of Africans and African countries and the socio-cultural, geographical, political and economic diversities they embody e.g. identifying Nigerians as distinct from Ghanaians or South Africans or Zimbabwean. In addition, Africans themselves are coming up with TV shows and documentaries showcasing the best their various countries have to offer such as Studio 53, the Nigerian talk show Moments with Mo and a host of others, showing that far from being a war-ravaged barren and arid expanse of space, there are big urban cities, middle classes, universities, office complexes, research institutes, shopping malls etc.  And lastly, the social media has provided an incredible platform for young Africans at an individual level to connect to the world and correct many misleading stereotypes by showcasing their potentials and rich diversity of the continent. According to CNN, Nigeria has a staggering 43 million internet users. This probably explains why there are Nigerian commentators on almost any important international issue on many popular news websites like CNN, BBC, Aljazeera, The Times online etc.

Despite all this optimism, the very disturbing phenomenon is that while the Western media is making some effort at transcending their traditional stereotype-laden coverage, the local media in a number of African countries seem to be taking over this gap of stereotype-laden coverage in spreading negative, exaggerated and often-misleading stories about and within their own countries. And in this case which is mostly prevalent in countries with deep ethno-religious divisions like Nigeria perpetuated by horizontal inequalities identified by Oxford university-based Abdul Raufu Mustapha as educational, economic and social inequalities, and therefore some of these divided groups tend to be better-off, more educated than others and therefore, logically with a greater media presence than other groups. These inequalities in socio-economic contexts and media presence, added to the ethno-regional cleavages, competition for power and influence, the divisive 2011 elections and the power of the internet is a POTENTIAL recipe for disaster. These were issues that I raised at the conference. However, one of the panelists, Ian Douglas of The Telegraph newspapers  reminded me that while my concerns were genuine, it was not entirely unique to Nigeria as hate-mongering individuals particularly in cyber space abound everywhere. It was a similar thing that happened in Kenya in the aftermath of the 2007 general elections where the media,  particularly local language radio were responsible for fuelling ethnic hatred and violence .  Thus, possible gaps left by the international media local media in some Sub Saharan African countries particularly in the case of Nigeria appear to be internalizing and localizing stereotypes against fellow citizens and social media appears to be following this pattern as well.

Just as the international media had the habit of regarding the African continent and all the constituent countries as if it is one country and entrenching that image in the minds of non-Africans, so also in the case of Nigeria the mainly southern-dominated media has traditionally cultivated the image of the other part of Nigeria – the North as if it were a single homogenous entity conveniently forgetting or ignoring the fact that it is made-up of 19 states, most of which have up to 10 or more distinct ethnic groups. For instance Kaduna state has is comprised of the Hausa/Fulanis, Kajes, Jabas etc; Borno state has Kanuri, Babur, Bachama, Shuwa etc; Kogi state has Igbira, Igala, Nupe, Yoruba, Hausa/Fulani so does Taraba, Plateau, Adamawa, Niger and other states. Though Muslims are in the majority, there are a significant number of Christians as well within these groups. However, the media for the most part clumps these diverse groups as one ‘homogenous’ entity – the North which in most cases surreptitiously implies Hausa/Fulanis the majority group. This might seem mundane but it is quite surprising and ironic that our sisters and brothers in the South – the South-East, South-South or South-West are actually unaware of these diversities in the north and believe the North is entirely made-up of Hausa/Fulani Muslims while all the Christians in the north are originally from the South. North is easily substituted for Hausa/Fulani-Muslims. This misinformation has been deliberately perpetuated by the media over the years, for reasons ranging from naivety, political mischief, malicious intent or just plain carelessness with grave consequences. For example, when the media starts making reference to the “North” having ruled for over 30years out of the Nigeria’s 50years of independence, it implies that the Hausa-Fulani-Muslims have ruled for those “over 30years”, while there are elements of truth there, it is exaggerated and in most cases for malicious reasons. For example General Yakubu Gowon, the military head of state who ruled for 9 years between July 1966 and 1975 is a Northerner yes, but a Christian from Kaduna state. What is the point of all this? Just to emphasize that it is these subtle omissions or carelessness or mischief by the media that laid the foundation for or at least aggravated the deep-seated prejudice, aggressive and hateful attacks in cyberspace and even the print and broadcast media Hausa-Fulanis are being subjected to these days. Concerns have been raised by journalists and commentators like Mohammed Haruna, former aviation Minister Femi Fani Kayode, Ishaq Modibbo Kawu and numerous bloggers and activists.

Secondly, just like the international media was (and to an extent is still) in the habit of portraying Africans as prone to violence, superstitious, and generally backwards so also is the Nigerian media prone to this tendency to erroneously classify all northerners (read mostly Hausa/Fulani-Muslims) as backwards, illiterate or even when educated are mere simpletons who are inferior, this has been so propagated by the media and ingrained in the consciousness and psyche of people from the South particularly the ones who have never been to the North who have not lived there or interacted well with people from there. This is something an average educated person from the north encounters almost on a daily basis at work, in school, in professional environments. A few years ago during my National Youth Service, some of the people I worked with from the South told me several times that they had no idea people and especially women from the North were “this” educated. Sometimes, this statement was made in such a naïve manner that onesimply laughed it off, and other-times it was very annoying, irritating and condescending to say the least and one had to remind them that there are a number of  universities amongst several other tertiary institutions churning out graduates every year in the “North”, not to mention the hundreds if not thousands of “northerners” studying abroad in several countries.

Another incident was a few months ago, here in the UK in while having a conversation with one of my fellow classmates from the south-east on a module which we all wanted to pass with very good grades, he said that I needn’t be worried after all when I graduate, I would simply be married-off as second or third wife to a “governor” (implying a rich, old man) as he said. I laughed-it-off and did not even bother responding to the obviously condescending statement. On the national front, people like Sanusi Lamido Sanusi who made efforts to sanitize the very rotten Nigerian banking sector and prevent economic collapse was initially labeled by mostly the media as embarking on plans to “islamize” the banking sector because he is a “jihadist”. Thankfully, that label never stuck to him, and it never deterred him from rescuing the ailing economy from impending collapse. Also, General Buhari, the only presidential candidate in 2003, 2007 and 2011 with any real chance of unseating the ruling hegemonic PDP with his impeccable reputation and integrity very unlike the string of corrupt and mediocre Nigerian politicians was variously maliciously labeled by the media as a jihadist bent on islamicizing and introducing Sharia Law to the whole of the country simply because a careless journalist misquoted him and despite the General’s numerous clarifications on the issue, it has been futile to say the least.

In conclusion, this seeming bias and promotion and perpetuation of stereotypes by the mainly southern-dominated press does no good to anyone, not least to the unity and cohesion of the country. When one side is constantly unfairly, erroneously and sometimes deliberately misrepresented over decades through what a brilliant columnist, Sanusi Abubakar selective narrative it poses a real danger, as it significantly affects how people perceive others, embeds deep-seated prejudice and when this persists the objects are gradually perceived of as less human. Mazin B. Qumsiyeh director of the American Arab Anti-discrmination committee describes this type of situation succinctly:

“stereotypes don’t only cause psychological harm (culture, insult) but also helps feed into actions that are physically harmful by dehumanizing a group first before attacking it”

This aptly captures the situation particularly with regards to the frequent ethno-religious and communal violence that have occurred in the several parts of the North recently, and how only victims from one side are recognized while the other side, even if it suffers casualty is disregarded by the media or not given due attention, and oft-times is regarded as deserving of whatever befalls it, such as the calculated massacres in Zonkwa and other parts of Southern-Kaduna of Hausa- Fulanis in the recent post-election violence which has yet to be given due coverage by the media. This portends danger for stability and cohesion and possibly a prelude to a form of social exclusion.

Therefore, this is where I believe the enormous potential of the social media could make or mar the difference. It could potentially provide a platform for all honest, sincere and well-meaning Nigerians to tell stories as they are without misleading and false colourations, political and sectional interests; devoid of bias or stereotypes, or it could simply project and magnify these stereotypes on a larger scale, perpetuate prejudice and aggravate the fracture within the Nigerian society. One desperately and fervently hopes the former is the case even though at the rate, people post hateful and offensive posts and materials on Facebook, Twitter and online Nigerian forums like Nigeria Village Square (NVS), it does not give much room to be very optimistic…only time will tell.